Toolbars,,Toolbars
#11
Posted 17 January 2012 - 09:32 PM
As with most things in life, there is a right way and a wrong way to go about things. If developers bundle in a fair and honest way - no problem.
#12
Posted 17 January 2012 - 09:44 PM
Normally, I'd say toolbars, etc, should be OPT-IN rather than OPT-OUT, but that would never work because nobody in their right mind would willingly install a toolbar so the developers choose to make you opt-out and hope most won't see it - thus it gets installed.
The whole issue of freeware has evolved over the years and the actual definition of freeware is a complicated one. Some say freeware is basically software which is commercial but given away, normally with some restrictions and with the option to upgrade to a paid version to unlock all other features. Others say freeware is, or should be, fully functional software distributed free of any charge or limitations but is closed source (as opposed to open source) and because of this it's often abandoned relatively quickly by developers who can't monetize from it because it becomes too difficult to maintain themselves.
There is truth in all those statements but the fact remains that developers will most probably need to try and figure alternative, and more user friendly ways to monetize from their software or websites as users are becoming increasingly frustrated with the number of developers utilizing add-ons, toolbars and all other manner of third party software in their installers. As for those who force users to install this stuff, or those who knowingly include third party apps which are considered dangerous or even suspicious, then they will have a very short shelf life on most responsible download sites.
Please remember that we have people from many different timezones on the site and if your post requires a reply it could take longer at some at some points because of this.
Forums
New Freeware on the site
Updated Freeware on the site
RSS Subscribe
Report bad freeware here
#13
Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:31 PM
The opt-in vs opt-out question is a tricky one. Those who utilize the opt-out (which I feel would be the majority) could argue that they are doing the right thing by offering an option not to install the extras in the first place. You and I know it is not quite an simple as that, but it is still a compelling argument. Then there's the universally accepted rule of thumb for consumers, 'caveat emptor' - let the buyer beware.
There is no doubt we would all prefer for the opt-in system to be widely utilized but realistically that is just is not going to happen - The Serenity Prayer:
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference.
On the definition of freeware - we published an article here on FreewareBB about that very subject, way back in November 2010:
http://www.freewarebb.com/topic/60059-the-term-freeware-is-it-always-applicable-today/
#14
Posted 19 January 2012 - 04:59 PM



#15
Posted 19 January 2012 - 07:30 PM
Please remember that we have people from many different timezones on the site and if your post requires a reply it could take longer at some at some points because of this.
Forums
New Freeware on the site
Updated Freeware on the site
RSS Subscribe
Report bad freeware here
#16
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:36 PM
#17
Posted 20 January 2012 - 11:41 PM



Similar Topics
Poll Should add-on software and toolbars be OPT-IN rather than OPT-OUT?Started by marko, 02 Jan 2011 |
|
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















