WOT reporting the author's site with a bad reputation

I ran it in a sandbox and it seems to be a very cool prog. So far so good.

This is one of the examples where it's rated negatively in WOT but without any comments having being left or any obvious reason for the bad rating.   Normally, we ignore this type of rating when it's obvious only one or two people have rated it because the rating can't be trusted in our opinion

I can tell you right now the negative rating is wrong,,this software does exactly what is says.

Seems a bit suspect to me --- like Amway's gone into software!

I haven't tested this software but it appears to provide a front end for a large number of online apps - mostly relating to images. I can see no harm in that, in fact I think it is a pretty good idea - on the proviso that all sites it links to are ethical and safe, and rated accordingly by leading site advisory services.

At this stage I cannot locate any evidence to suggest this software or the home site present any risk. Both McAfee Site Advisor and Browser Defender give the site (and related downloads) a clean bill of health:
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/internet-marketing-software.pro
http://www.browserdefender.com/site/internet-marketing-software.pro/

Hello,

George here, the soft's designer. A warm thank you for defending it.

Look, I spend hours to developing these 100% clean and useful freewares. There are no affiliate links inside, no string attached. I don't even collect email addresses, as they are offered a direct download way.

Who wants more?
To me, people who spit on valuable gifts should go to either church or psychoanalyst, or both

Wot is not God on Earth. Everyone is not rating everything at Wot. If you have any doubt just visit my FB fan page, and type "Internet marketing software" in GG.

I double check the sites my softs take to, however, sometimes web masters change their pages; they add weird things, annoying ads and popups etc. If you detect some strange things, please, just let me know, I'll remove them from the soft.

Have a nice 2012!

Thanks for dropping by George, and confirming what we already suspected. Your negative rating from WOT, without any substantiating evidence at all, is one the worst aspects of these site advisory services. We have just recently taken WOT to task over this very matter and the damage they can cause to site's and/or software's reputation by applying an incorrect negative rating. A red or amber rating constitutes an accusation and our feeling is that any accusation ought to be backed up by solid reasoning (proof).

FreewareBB will continue making common sense appraisals based on the FACTS, not on third party opinions.

All the best mate,
Cheers...Jim

Again I will have to question this software and its inclusion in this site.
If anyone has received those yellow envelopes in the mail containing heaps of groupons , some useful, but most junk ,
well this is the online equivalent.

Hello James,

Yes. It's obvious that no rating shouldn't be interpreted as negative, but neutral.

Thank you.